The Effect of Green Accounting Dimensions on the Quality of Life of Communities Surrounding Mining Areas: A Panel Data Analysis of Mining Companies in Indonesia (2020–2024)

  • Ros Nirwana Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pancasetia
  • Adista Anjar Diany Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pancasetia
  • Suzi Suzana Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pancasetia
  • Prio Satrio Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pancasetia

Abstract

This study examines the effect of environmental, social, and economic dimensions of Green Accounting on the Quality of Life of communities surrounding mining companies in Indonesia. Using purposive sampling, the study analyzes panel data consisting of 95 observations from 19 mining companies over the period 2020–2024. The data are analyzed using panel regression with the Fixed Effects Model (FEM), selected based on model specification tests, and estimated with robust standard errors to ensure reliable results. The findings indicate that environmental performance has a positive and significant effect on Quality of Life, while social and economic performance do not show significant effects. The model explains 44.58% of the variation in Quality of Life, indicating a moderate explanatory power. These results suggest that environmental practices provide more direct and measurable impacts on community welfare compared to social and economic initiatives. This study contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence that the effectiveness of Green Accounting dimensions is not uniform, where environmental aspects play a more dominant role in improving Quality of Life. The findings also extend Stakeholder Theory and Legitimacy Theory by highlighting that corporate environmental responsibility is more strongly associated with stakeholder welfare and social legitimacy than other dimensions. From a policy perspective, the results imply that mining companies and regulators should prioritize environmental performance as a key driver of community welfare, while improving the effectiveness and targeting of CSR programs and economic contributions to generate more tangible social impacts.

Keywords: Green Accounting, Environmental, Social, Economic, Quality of Life

References

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Laporan Statistik Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Forest Watch Indonesia. (2023). Ekspansi pertambangan nikel picu deforestasi. FWI. https://fwi.or.id/ekspansi-pertambangan-nikel-picu-deforestasi/
Grey, R., et al. (2014). Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 15–28.
Haryanto, T., Wijaya, A., & Santoso, P. (2019). Economic performance of mining companies and community well-being. Resources Policy, 63, 101422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101422
Husda, A., & Azmiana, A. (2023). Pengaruh Green Accounting terhadap Kinerja Keuangan pada Perusahaan Pertambangan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 12(1), 1–15.
Istiningrum, R. (2024). Environmental disclosure and legitimacy in mining companies: Impact on community quality of life. Journal of Environmental Accounting, 5(1), 45–60.
Jovanović, M. (2023). Sustainability practices and community quality of life in mining operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 404, 136657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136657
KLHK (Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan). (2020). Laporan Kinerja Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.
Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C. (2010). Sustainability Accounting and Reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10), 1017–1025.
Linda, L., & Tiara, T. (2022). Pengaruh Aspek Lingkungan dan Sosial terhadap Kualitas Hidup Karyawan, Nasabah, Masyarakat, dan Lingkungan Bank Muamalat. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 25(1), 1–12.
Makaryanawati, A., & Masruroh, A. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and company value in the mining sector in Indonesia. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(5), 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-07-2019-0252
Mulkhan, M. (2017). Stakeholder engagement and community development in mining industries. International Journal of Business and Society, 18(3), 537–550.
Musthofa, M., Prasetyo, Y., & Nugraheni, E. (2024). Nickel mining reduced forest cover in Indonesia but had mixed social outcomes. ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624001234
Nisa, F., et al. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Green Accounting terhadap Kinerja Keuangan pada Perusahaan Pertambangan. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 23(2), 123–140.
Oktaviani, R., & Nugroho, A. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and community quality of life in mining areas. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(5), 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2020-0041
Rahmadani, F., Akbar, T., & Sari, R. (2025). Water quality condition from upstream to downstream of Mahakam River: Impact of mining activities. International Journal of Ecology and Sustainability Studies, 6(1), 22–35. https://journalkeberlanjutan.com/index.php/ijesss/article/view/752
Sirait, P., & Abdullah, R. (2023). Evaluating environmental and human health impacts of mining sector in Indonesia. Environmental Science & Policy, 145, 10–22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S146290112300251X
Siregar, R., Hadi, S., & Putra, A. (2018). The development of Indonesia environmental performance and environmental compliance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 1045–1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.145
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2023). Human Development Report 2023. UNDP. https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-index
WALHI. (2020). Penambangan Nikel di Sulawesi Tengah: Dampak Lingkungan dan Sosial. WALHI.
WHO-World Health Organization. (2018). Environmental Health in Indonesia. World Health Organization.
World Bank. (2023). Indonesia Country Climate and Development Report. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/
World Bank. (2018). Laporan Pembangunan Dunia: Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Kerusakan Lingkungan. World Bank.
     Plum Analytic Metrics

Published
2026-03-19
How to Cite
Nirwana, R., Diany, A., Suzana, S., & Satrio, P. (2026). The Effect of Green Accounting Dimensions on the Quality of Life of Communities Surrounding Mining Areas: A Panel Data Analysis of Mining Companies in Indonesia (2020–2024). Jesya, 9(1), 521-536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36778/jesya.v9i1.2601

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.