Kolaborasi Model Quadpel Helix Dalam Pengembangan Smart City; Sebuah Tinjauan Teoritis
Abstract
The idea of Smart City Development has become a trend for the last 10 years. The key concept in this development emphasizes collaboration. Providing concepts, building designs, up to the implementation of building cities that are able to accommodate various interests. But how does this vision relate to current practice in cities? This paper discusses the role of stakeholders who collaborate and build cooperation networks for the development of Smart City.
The approach used in this article is a form of collaboration and the idea of a "quadruple helix" for urban innovation. quadruple helix model as a smart city design principle in which technological and social innovations result from cooperation and synergy between four stakeholder groups: administration, business, science, and residents. This study finds information that each entity has a major role in the development of Smart City. Then there is the need for other entities in other helix models that need to be involved in the development of smart cities in urban settings.
References
Bellandi, M., Donati, L., & Cataneo, A. (2021). Social innovation governance and the role of universities: Cases of quadruple helix partnerships in Italy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120518
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Use in Innovation Networks and Knowledge Clusters (Praeger, 2006), E-Development Toward the Knowledge Economy. In Int. J. Technology Management (Vol. 46). Palgrave Macmillan.
Ching, T. Y., & Ferreira, J. (2015). Smart cities: Concepts, perceptions and lessons for planners. Planning Support Systems and Smart Cities. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18368-8_8
El Hendy, M., Miniaoui, S., Atalla, S., & Hashim, K. F. Bin. (2017). A survey on smart city technologies, initiatives and global technology providers. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, March 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3018896.3025132
Emmanuel, R., Aarrevaara, E., Duenas, J., Thomson, C., Gallagher, C., Maksheeva, A. & Keya, S. (eds. . (2012). Banff Proceedings 2021 (Vol. 23).
García-Terán, J., & Skoglund, A. (2019). A Processual Approach for the Quadruple Helix Model: the Case of a Regional Project in Uppsala. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10(3), 1272–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-018-0521-5
Group, V. I. (2015). 2015 S Tr Ategic Directions : Smart Utility Report a Note About.
Hasche, N., Höglund, L., & Linton, G. (2020). Quadruple helix as a network of relationships: creating value within a Swedish regional innovation system. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 32(6), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2019.1643134
Höglund, L., & Linton, G. (2018). Smart specialization in regional innovation systems: a quadruple helix perspective. R and D Management, 48(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12306
Iqbal, J., Kousar, S., & ul Hameed, W. (2018). Antecedents of sustainable social entrepreneurship initiatives in Pakistan and Outcomes: Collaboration between quadruple helix sectors. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124539
Nordberg, K., Mariussen, Å., & Virkkala, S. (2020). Community-driven social innovation and quadruple helix coordination in rural development. Case study on LEADER group Aktion Österbotten. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.001
Paskaleva, K., Evans, J., & Watson, K. (2021). Co-producing smart cities: A Quadruple Helix approach to assessment. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28(4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764211016037
Robinson, J. (2016). Thinking cities through elsewhere: Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies. Progress in Human Geography, 40(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515598025
Roman, M., Varga, H., Cvijanovic, V., & Reid, A. (2020). Quadruple Helix models for sustainable regional innovation: Engaging and facilitating civil society participation. Economies, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ECONOMIES8020048
Selada, C. (2017). Smart Cities and the Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems Conceptual Framework: The Case of Portugal. In The Quadruple Innovation Helix Nexus (pp. 211–244). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55577-9_8
Suzic, B., Ulmer, A., & Schumacher, J. (2020). Complementarities and synergies of quadruple helix innovation design in smart city development. 2020 Smart City Symposium …. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9133961/
Vallance, P., Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Kempton, L. (2020). Building collaborative platforms for urban innovation: Newcastle City Futures as a quadruple helix intermediary. European Urban and Regional Studies, 27(4), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776420905630
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
